Menu Home

KENNETH GENTRY’S CONFUSION & THE ANALOGY OF SCRIPTURE ON DANIEL 12:2-3=MATTHEW 13:39-43=MATTHEW 24:1-31

KENNETH GENTRY’S CONFUSION AND THE ANALOGY OF SCRIPTURE ON DANIEL 12:2-3=MATTHEW 13:39-43=MATTHEW 24:1-31 By: Michael J. Sullivan This article will focus on Kenneth Gentry’s confusing comments about the disciples question concerning “the end of the age” in Matthew 24:3 and Mr. Gentry’s admission that the resurrection of Daniel 12:2-3 was a […]

AN OPEN LETTER TO: GARY DEMAR, JOHN MACARTHUR AND DAVID ENGELSMA–“COMPARING SCRIPTURE WITH SCRIPTURE,” PARTIAL PRETERISM, DISPENSATIONALISM, AND CALVINISM

Dear Gary DeMar, John MacArthur and David Engelsma,                           January 19, 2009   This letter/article is in response to Gary DeMar’s article critiquing you John entitled, A Defense of Dispensationalism.  Here I wish to discuss some of the issues the article brings up such as:  1)  Does the partial preterist position […]

AN OPEN LETTER TO GARY NORTH CONCERNING DAVID CHILTON AND THE “ESCHATOLOGICAL SCHIZOPHRENIA” OF PARTIAL PRETERISM ON THE RESURRECTION OF DANIEL 12 / MATTHEW 13

AN OPEN LETTER TO GARY NORTH CONCERNING DAVID CHILTON AND THE “ESCHATOLOGICAL SCHIZOPHRENIA” OF PARTIAL PRETERISM ON THE RESURRECTION OF DANIEL 12 / MATTHEW 13 BY: MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN   Dear Mr. Gary North,                                                                                                 January 5, 2009   The main purpose of this letter is to address: 1) Your public comments of David […]